Author Archives:

Results from the June 2021 cycle

This month, we received 17 proposals and accepted 7 for GN and 4 for GS.  There were a few cases where proposals were not fully anonymized as per the DARP rules (please see the FT DARP rules for more information).  In … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Proposals for the next cycle due June 30

Proposals for the next cycle are due June 30.  Successful proposals will be active for the period August – October.  Please see the 21B telescope schedules for instrument availabilities. As a reminder for reviewers, please be courteous in your reviews.  You … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Proposals for the next cycle due June 30

Results from the April 2021 cycle

We have just finished the April FT cycle review process.  We received a total of 20 proposals and were able to accept 5 at Gemini North and 5 at Gemini South.   It appeared that every proposal followed the DARP guidelines this … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Results from the April 2021 cycle

April cycle proposals due this Friday

As a reminder, this will be the 3rd month of DARP (Dual anonymous review).  This has so far been going well.  Almost everyone has used the correct DARP template. However, there have been cases where proposers have identified themselves within the text with statements … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on April cycle proposals due this Friday